A Friend of the Court
CLF seeks to advance the public good by articulating to our courts legal and moral principles that are consistent with, and illuminated by, our Christian faith. Over nearly two decades, CLF has intervened in 19 separate proceedings, seeking to advance justice, protect the vulnerable, and advocate for freedom of religion, conscience, and expression.
- a well-established history of active involvement in matters of public policy and law, especially matters involving issues surrounding the Charter.
- appeared before Parliamentary committees and made representations to provincial governments on issues of conscience, religious freedom, inviolability of life, human rights and issues generally affecting the family.
- Special Consultative Status as an NGO with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations, and has been involved in numerous international matters and court submissions.
- also been an intervener before the courts in matters involving freedom of religion and conscience, including the interface of s. 2(a)-(b) of the Charter and s. 15 of the Charter, and related provisions in Human Rights Codes, as well as issues affecting the inviolability of life and the family.
The Supreme Court of Canada and other courts have granted the CLF intervener status, either individually or with others, in the following cases among others (listed chronologically from the most recent.)
Case: E.T. v Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board (to be heard by the Ontario Court of Appeal on June 26, 2017)
Summary: CLF has been granted leave to intervene as a friend of the court in this appeal, which concerns a father, E.T., who has requested that the respondent school board inform him when certain subjects (such as sexuality, gender and marriage) are scheduled to be taught in his children’s classes. The school board refused to grant E.T. his request for religious accommodation, stating that the effect of doing so would heighten the risk of discrimination for other students by sending a message that there is something wrong with what is being taught. The lower court agreed, finding that the Board’s decision struck a reasonable balance between E.T.’s rights and the Board’s “competing legislative mandate" as well as "Charter values favouring inclusivity, equality and multiculturalism.” CLF will urge the court to carefully circumscribe the role of Charter values in its decisions, particularly when other Charter rights are engaged. In particular, CLF explains that a “values analysis” inappropriately requires courts to engage in moral prioritizing rather than rights adjudication and undermines a robust legal analysis that rests on evidentiary requirements. CLF is currently scheduled to give oral argument on Monday, June 26.
CLF's Factum in support of its motion for leave to intervene - Filed May 5, 2017
CLF's Intervener Factum - Filed May 18, 2017
Case: The Christian Medical Dental Society et al v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (to be heard by the Ontario Divisional Court on June 13-15, 2017)
Summary: Christian Legal Fellowship has been granted leave to intervene jointly in this case with the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada and the Assembly of Catholic Bishops of Ontario. This coalition of interveners will advocate for freedom of religion, religious equality, and conscience rights for health care professionals. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has adopted (1) a Human Rights policy mandating effective referrals and obligatory emergency care even if it conflicts with conscience or religious beliefs; and (2) a Medical Assistance in Dying policy that specifically requires effective referrals for assisted suicide. CLF supports CMDS in its position that, among other things, these policies violate religious freedom and equality, are not in the public interest, limit patient choice and undermine the principle of state neutrality.
CLF's Factum in support of its motion for leave to intervene - Filed January 25, 2017
CLF's Joint Interveners' Factum - Filed April 12, 2017
Case: Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia (heard by the Supreme Court of Canada, judgment pending)
Summary: CLF was granted leave to intervene, jointly with the Evangelical Fellowship of Canada, in Ktunaxa Nation v. British Columbia. The case involves a claim by the Ktunaxa Nation to prevent the government of B.C. from permitting the development of lands that the Nation views as sacred. Ktunaxa Nation's claim failed at the courts below as it was found to fall outside of the scope of the protection of religious freedom. The BC Court of Appeal suggested that the Charter does not protect religious exercise to the extent that it requires others to “act or refrain from acting and behave in a manner consistent with a belief that they do not share.”
CLF and EFC's Joint Intervener Factum - Filed October 24, 2016
Case: Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, 2016 ONCA 518
Summary: Judicial review of the Law Society of Upper Canada's (LSUC) denial of accreditation of TWU's proposed law school proceeded before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Divisional Court) on June 1-4, 2015. On July 2 the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed Trinity Western University’s (TWU) application for judicial review, deciding that the Law Society of Upper Canada’s (LSUC) decision to not accredit TWU’s proposed law school was reasonable. TWU appealed the decision. CLF has been granted intervenor status at the Court of Appeal and has filed written arguments
- Ontario Court of Appeal's Decision - Released June 29, 2016
- CLF's ONCA Intervener Factum - Filed February 26, 2016
- Divisional Court's Decision - Released July 2, 2015
- CLF's Divisional Court Intervener Factum - Filed May 4, 2015
- CLF's Divisional Court Leave to Intervene - Granted September 2, 2014
Case: Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of British Columbia, 2015 BCSC 2326
Summary: On May 14, 2015, CLF was granted standing to intervene in the judicial review of the Law Society of British Columbia's (LSBC) decision to not accredit TWU's proposed law school. In August, 2015, The B.C. Supreme Court heard TWU’s judicial review application arising from the Law Society of British Columbia's (LSBC) decision to reject TWU's proposed law school. CLF was an intervener in the proceeding. The Honourable Justice Hinkson decided in TWU's favour. The LSBC has appealed. CLF has been granted intervenor status in the appeal.
- CLF's BCCA Intervener Factum - Filed April 19, 2016
- CLF'S BCCA Leave to Intervene Application - Filed February 18, 2016
- Supreme Court of British Columbia Decision - Released December 10, 2015
- CLF's BCSC Intervener Factum - Filed July 24, 2015
- LSBC Website Devoted to TWU Judicial Review
Case: Trinity Western University v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, 2015 NSSC 25
Summary: The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia held in 2015 that Christian law students have a right to attend a private religious law school with others who share their faith, and to practice law in Nova Scotia without facing additional barriers based on their beliefs. Christian Legal Fellowship (CLF) intervened in the case represented by Deina Warren, Philip Fourie, and David Bond. CLF promoted the recognition of freedom of religion and equality rights of law students and lawyers in Canada. The Nova Scotia Barristers' Society appealed in 2016 and CLF has was granted intervener status in the appeal to the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal.
- CLF's NSCA Intervener Factum - Filed February 26, 2016
- CLF Press Release - Published January 29, 2015
- Nova Scotia Supreme Court Decision - Released January 28, 2015
- Hearing Summary
- CLF's NSSC Intervener Factum - Filed October 28, 2014
Case: Carter v. Canada (AG), 2016 SCC 4
Topic: Physician-Assisted Suicide (Request for extension of suspension of invalidation issued in Carter 2015)
Case: D'Amico et Saba c Procureure général du Québec
Topic: Physician-Assisted Suicide (Whether paramountcy renders Quebec's An Act respecting end-of-life care (Bill 52) inoperative)
- Quebec Court of Appeal Decision [French] - Released December 22, 2015
- CLF Commentary on QCCA Decision - Published December 22, 2015
- Quebec Superior Court Decision [French] - Released December 1, 2015
- CLF Commentary on QCCS Decision - Published December 1, 2015
Case: Loyola High School and John Zucchi v. Attorney General of Québec, 2015 SCC 12
Topic: Freedom of Religion and Association (Whether the state can secuarlize the teaching of religion and morality within the very walls of a private Catholic school)
Summary: Such was the central question framed by the Superior Court in this case after Loyola, a private Catholic school, was denied permission by the Quebec government to teach a mandatory Ethics and Religious Culture (ERC) course from a Catholic perspective. The provincial curriculum required Loyola, in the words of the Superior Court, to teach “a pedagogy contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church” but the Québec Court of Appeal ruled in the government’s favour. CLF intervened before the Supreme Court of Canada and highlighted how the purpose of the ERC program was to shape children’s thinking and character. CLF argued that a religious school must be given the freedom to teach such a curriculum from its own faith perspective, and that any interference with that right contravenes the Canadian Charter, the Quebec Charter and international law.
While the SCC was divided (4-3) on some issues, it was unanimous in its affirmation that the state cannot oblige a private religious school to teach morals and religion from a perspective that contradicts its own doctrine. The court’s decision incorporated CLF’s submissions on the Quebec Charter and international covenants (paras. 64-65, 96-97), affirming parents have a legally protected right to pass on their beliefs to their children. The court also affirmed that an “essential ingredient of the vitality of a religious community is the ability of its members to pass on their beliefs to their children”, and measures which disrupt that vitality “represent a profound interference with religious freedom” (paras. 64, 67).
- Supreme Court of Canada Decision - Released March 19, 2015
- CLF Press Release - Published March 19, 2015
- CLF's Leave to Intervene - Granted March 17, 2014
- CLF's Intervenor Factum - Filed March 10, 2014
- CLF Press Release - Published March 21, 2014
- CLF Press Release - Published January, 2014
Case: Carter v. Canada (AG), 2015 SCC 5
Topic: Physician Assisted Suicide (The constitutionality of section 241(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, the criminal prohibition against physician-assisted dying)
Summary: On February 6, 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada unanimously struck down as unconstitutional Canada’s Criminal Code provisions banning physician-assisted suicide, but has given Parliament one year to create a new regime with a stringently limited, carefully monitored system of exceptions to the ban. Christian Legal Fellowship was an intervenor in the case.
- Supreme Court of Canada's Decision - Released February 6, 2015
- CLF Press Release - Published February 6, 2015
- CLF's SCC Intervenor Factum - Filed August 25, 2014
- British Columbia Court of Appeal Decision - Released October 10, 2013
- CLF Press Release - Published October 10, 2013
- CLF Press Release - Published March 19, 2013
- CLF's BCCA Intervener Factum - Filed December 20, 2012
- CLF Press Release - Published December 14, 2012
- CLF Press Release - Published June 15, 2012
- Supreme Court of British Columbia's Decision - Released June 15, 2012
Case: Canada (Attorney General) v Bedford, 2012 SCC 72,  SCR 1101
Topic: Prostitution (The constitutionality of portions of the Criminal Code designed to protect victims of prostitution)
- Supreme Court of Canada Decision - Released December 20, 2013
- CLF Press Release - Published December 20, 2013
- CLF Press Release - Published June, 2013
- CLF's SCC Oral Arguments - Presented June 13, 2013
- CLF's SCC Intervener Factum - Filed May 30, 2013
- Ontario Court of Appeal Decision - Released March 26, 2012
- Ontario Superior Court Decision - Released September 28, 2010
Case: Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v Whatcott, 2013 SCC 11
Topic: Hate Speech (Freedom of expression and the constitutionality of the enforcement of statutory hate-speech prohibitions against religious speech)
Case: Ginette Leblanc v Le Procureur Général du Canada et al, no. 400-17-002642-110
Topic: Physician Assisted Suicide (The constitutionality of section 241(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, RSC 1985, c C-46, the criminal prohibition against physician-assisted dying)
- CLF Press Release - Published December 14, 2012
- CLF's Intervener Factum - Filed December 7, 2012
- CLF's Leave to Intervene [English] [French] - Granted July 6, 2012
Case: S.L., et al v Commission Scolaire Des Chenes, et al,  1 SCR 235
Topic: Freedom of Religion (Whether the right to freedom of religion and conscience includes the freedom of parents to bring up their children in the religion of their choice without interference of the State)
Case: A Reference by the Lieutenant Governor in Council to the Supreme Court of British Columbia under The Constitutional Questions Act, RSBC 1986
Topic: Polygamy (C 68 relating to the criminal prohibition against polygamy under The Criminal Code of Canada, RSC 1985, c C-46)
- Supreme Court of British Columbia Decision - November 23, 2011
- CLF Press Release - Published December 6, 2010
- CLF's Oral Arguments - Submitted November 8, 2010
- CLF's Leave to Intervene - Granted February 18, 2010
- BC Attorney General Press Release - Published October 22, 2009
Case: A Reference by the Lieutenant Governor in Council to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal under The Constitutional Questions Act, RSS 1978
Topic: The Marriage Act (Concerning Marriage Commissioners Appointed Under The Marriage Act, 1995, S 1995, c M-4.1) (commonly referred to as The Marriage Commissioners’ Reference))
Case: Alberta v Hutterian Brethren of Wilson Colony,  2 SCR 567
Topic: Freedom of Religion (The inviolability of freedom of religion and freedom of association to individuals and religious communities)
Case: Alliance for Marriage and Family v. A.A.,  3 S.C.R. 124, 2007 SCC 40
Topic: Parentage and the Traditional Family (The redefinition of parentage and the traditional family)
Notes: Christian Legal Fellowship intervened in the case as a member of the Alliance for Marriage and Family.
- Supreme Court of Canada Order - Released September 13, 2007
- Alliance for Marriage and Family's Leave to Appeal Application
- CLF Press Release - September 13, 2007
- Ontario Court of Appeal Decision - Released January 2, 2007
- Alliance for Marriage and Family's ONCA Intervener Factum - Filed August 22, 2006
Case: Kempling v British Columbia College of Teachers, 2005 BCCA 327
Topic: Freedom of Religion and Expression (The extent to which a teacher's professional association can discipline a teacher for out-of-classroom expression and whether the fundamental freedoms guaranteed in the Charter extend to teachers in this context)
Notes: Christian Legal Fellowship intervened in this case as a member of the Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance.
- British Columbia Court of Appeal Decision - Released June 13, 2005
- Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance's Intervener Factum
Case: Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Scott Brockie,  OJ No 2375
Topic: Freedom of Conscience (Whether business owners have a right of conscientious objection under the Ontario Human Rights Code)
Notes: Christian Legal Fellowship intervened in this case as a member of the Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance.
- Ontario Superior Court Decision - Released June 17, 2002
- Canadian Religious Freedom Alliance's Intervener Factum - Filed August 10, 2001
Case: Trinity Western University v British Columbia College of Teachers,  1 SCR 772
Topic: Limitations of Jurisdiction (Whether it is within the jurisdiction of a teacher's regulatory body to determine if a private university's community standards promote discrimination against homosexuals)
- Supreme Court of Canada Decision - Released May 17, 2001
Case: Vriend v Alberta,  1 SC 493
Topic: Grounds for Discrimination (Whether sexual orientation should be a prohibited ground of discrimination in the Individual Rights Protection Act of Alberta)
- Supreme Court of Canada Decision - Released April 2, 1998